Hy3 vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 18.8 points higher (25.3 vs 6.5) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). Pick Hy3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Scout.
| Metric | Hy3 | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 6.5 | −74.3% Llama 4 Scout is 74.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $73.56 | −50.8% Llama 4 Scout is 50.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 5.16s | −84.5% Llama 4 Scout is 84.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Hy3: 74.3% less intelligence, 50.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Hy3Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill