Llama 4 Scout vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 23.8 points higher (30.3 vs 6.5) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $73.6; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Beam 1.0 when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 30.3 | +366.2% Beam 1.0 is 4.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $318.73 | +333.3% Beam 1.0 is 4.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.16s | 8.02s | +55.4% Beam 1.0 is 55.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Llama 4 Scout: 366.2% more intelligence, 333.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Llama 4 ScoutBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill