MiMo-V2.5 vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 8.5 points higher (30.3 vs 21.8) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $61.9; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Beam 1.0 when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.8 | 30.3 | +39.0% Beam 1.0 is 39.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $61.93 | $318.73 | +414.7% Beam 1.0 is 5.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.73s | 8.02s | −80.8% Beam 1.0 is 80.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.27 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs MiMo-V2.5: 39.0% more intelligence, 414.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-0424/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill