MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 3.1% less intelligence, 85.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 25.2 | −3.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $427.73 | +85.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 85.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.58s | 46.20s | −6.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 6.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill