Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 2.4T A95BOff the frontier
Intelligence
39.90
Total cost
$2632
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.739.9+49.4% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 49.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,632.05— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.90s61.67s+287.9% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 287.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.11 / $0.33$2.00 / $6.00
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats itQwen3.8 2.4T A95B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill