Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 21.7 points higher (29.5 vs 7.8) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $159; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 7.8 | −73.6% Solar Pro 3 is 73.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $159.22 | −93.0% Solar Pro 3 is 93.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.67s | 18.88s | +13.3% Solar Pro 3 is 13.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3.7 Max: 73.6% less intelligence, 93.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Qwen3.7 MaxSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill