Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Plus scores 12.5 points higher (25.2 vs 12.7) but costs 3.9× as much to run the benchmark ($428 vs $111; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Plus when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Granite 4.2 30B when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 25.2 | +98.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 98.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $427.73 | +285.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 3.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 54.96s | 45.52s | −17.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 17.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Granite 4.2 30B: 98.4% more intelligence, 285.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Granite 4.2 30BQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill