LongCat 2.0 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: LongCat 2.0 by LongCat or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs LongCat 2.0: 123.6% more intelligence, 48.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 42.7 | +123.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | $283.18 | −48.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 48.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.69s | 23.83s | −33.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 33.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
LongCat 2.0MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill