Qwen3.7 Max vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs Qwen3.7 Max: 2.7% more intelligence, 86.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Max | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 30.3 | +2.7% Beam 1.0 is 2.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,277.12 | $318.73 | −86.0% Beam 1.0 is 86.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.61s | 8.02s | −51.7% Beam 1.0 is 51.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.50 / $7.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Qwen3.7 MaxBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-max/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill